Draft Animal Law January 11, 2026 1 min read

Silent Exemptions: Accepted Agricultural Practices and Enforcement Gaps

Jurisdiction: Arizona

Failure Mode

Vague statutory definitions create an unreviewable safe harbor for industrial violations.

Proposed Fix

Establish clear, evidence-based criteria for accepted practices with mandatory biannual reporting.

Executive Summary

  • Vague definitions of accepted agricultural practices prevent effective enforcement
  • Lack of mandatory reporting creates a data vacuum for oversight bodies
  • Current statutes favor industrial-scale operations over transparency

Background

In Arizona, “accepted agricultural practices” are often cited as a broad exemption to various environmental and welfare regulations. However, the definition of what constitutes an “accepted” practice is rarely defined in statute, leaving it to the discretion of industry-heavy advisory boards.

The Problem

The current system relies on self-regulation and a lack of reporting. Because these practices are exempt, there is no official record of when or how they are applied, making it impossible for oversight bodies to determine if the exemption is being misused to cover standard violations.

Proposed Solution

By codifying specific, measurable standards for these practices and requiring basic registration of facilities using the exemption, the state can maintain a functional oversight mechanism without placing undue burden on legitimate agricultural operations.


Actions Taken & Evidence

Current Status: Pending submission to Arizona Attorney General

Recipients: Arizona Attorney General, State Senate Committee on Natural Resources

Suggested Citation

Mukund Thiru, "Silent Exemptions: Accepted Agricultural Practices and Enforcement Gaps," Failure Modes, January 2026. https://failuremodesarchive.org/memos/2026-01-11-silent-exemptions/

Original Document

Open in New Tab